Tuesday, July 30, 2024

Psoa ... Don't do that

It hurts when I move my right leg forward. You kind of need to do that when you run. This could be due to an issue with my psoas, or it could possibly be something else. The psoa muscle winds from the side of the spine, around the hip to the front of the leg, and attaches (eventually) to the femur.  My pain is at the top-front of my thigh. Although I'm not quite so sure what exactly it is, I do know that I've experienced it before at the Sam Alpern Half-Marathon.


((My Dad's old Vaudeville joke: A guy goes to the doctor, saying, "Doc, it hurts when I raise my arm like this." The doctor asks, "Did you every have this before?" The guy answers in the affirmative. The doctor then makes his diagnosis: "Well, you've got it again." ... Alternative scenario. A guy goes to the doctor, saying, "Doc, it hurts when I raise my arm like this." The doctor says, "Well then don't do that."))


You know the way you should listen to your body and know when to back off hard training to prevent small pains from becoming big ones? I never learned how to do that. On the other hand, it's not quite completely awful yet. Maybe I'm nipping it in the bud by taking things easier than planned this week. Naaah.



Monday, July 29, 2024

Mindless Madness

Bridge on the River Kwai is one of my all-time favorite movies. I've seen it about a hundred times. At the end of the movie, the Dr. Clipton character, flabbergasted by the events that transpired, walks around and exclaims, "Madness!"


It speaks to the madness of war, But it's also a metaphor for the current state of my running. 

After last week's failed attempt at a long run, I ran another 14 on Lester, followed by a rare day off, and then two 9-mile heavenly Hinckley Hills loops on Sunday, where I finally did achieve true long runniness. Somehow, it's all adding up to a lot. Maybe too much.

Today, I thought, would be easier. Just bang out a few mindless miles on the mill. It's what I did last Monday, when I similarly needed a bit of rest. But that didn't happen. At the last possible moment, I learned of a group run from the (Medina) Square. I can't not run with these friends, so over to the Square I went. 

It was a decent six-mile-ish run, and I was happy to be able to mostly stay with the small group. "How many more are you gonna do, Dan?" asked Harold Dravenstott, as he was getting ready to leave. "Double digits for the day would be nice, but I'm mighty tired," I answered.

Then it was time for some seriously mindless miles. These would be over to, and around the middle school track. When I got there, the mindless madness ensued. I suppose I could have kept going, but I did indeed become more than a little mightily tired. I got up to eight, which is actually 10 in base eight.

Want more mindless madness? Stay tuned.

Thursday, July 25, 2024

Lookin' for chafing in all the wrong places

It's gonna hurt, and there's absolutely nothing I can do about it. Best to just turn the water on and step into the shower quickly. The faster I get in, the sooner it will all be over with. "YEEEOWW!" I think the neighbors three doors down are probably able to hear it. And I was correct: no amount of anticipation can prepare a person for that kind of pain. 

Prevention, of course, would have been nice. But lookyahere: I tried that. The chafing happened anyway. It's almost as if there's nothing that can stop it. Of course, there's not running. Hey - maybe I'll try that next time!

This time, I actually did cut my long run short because I felt the beginnings of the chafing coming on. It's like sunburn in that way. Once you begin to feel it, it's already too late for you. And I should know: it's happened quite a few times already this summer. This summer is already worse than any others I can remember in terms of chafing. And the worst of it: it ain't over yet.

This week had been going okay, considering Sunday's Half. But getting my long run in today would have really been nice. Now, I'll probably have to do two 9-mile Hinckley loops this Sunday. Okay, you got me. I probably would have done that anyway.

Sunday, July 21, 2024

The last time I broke 1:50 in a Half. And 1:40. And 1:30.

It was 2018 in New Philly. Seems like a long time ago, but I guess six years is a bit. I'd done much better the year before with a 1:45. I think I might be able to be back in the 1:40s if I put my mind to it. But that's a Big If.

Here is a history of my Half-Marathons, according to Athlinks. I'm sure there are some that are missing, and this list only begins in 1998. I may have gotten under 1:24 at some point, but I'm not sure at this point.  Enjoy!





Pan American Masters Games Half-Marathon

Is this cheating? I'm not sure. I am running through Cleveland's Cultural Gardens, and I'm running the tangents. This isn't easy, since there is automobile traffic coming and going both ways. But it seems to be the only way of catching up to Larry Logan. I manage to do this around mile 7.5. I'd been stalking him from behind since very early in the race.

Larry had beaten me by about a mile at the track 1500 last Sunday. He's from Michigan, and we've run many of the same races in the past, but we only just met last Sunday. He's super-fast, but perhaps the half-marathon distance will get to him. I can only hope. We exchange hellos and then I pull ahead. This is great, I think. Maybe now I'll win the age group for this here Pan American Masters Games Half-Marathon.

It's not so great when he zooms by me around mile 9. Oh well, I think. Second won't be so bad. I'm not sure where third-place guy is, but I'm nevertheless running well, so I don't think he's ahead of me. I'm keeping a steady pace, but I can't seem to pick it up any faster, nor can I get any closer to Larry. He's way ahead, but he's not pulling away any further. 

But then I see him walking. I catch up a bit, but then he starts running again and I realize I only made up a bit of ground. This situation repeats several times, until I manage to catch and pass him once again with a mile to go. I finish in 1:50:49, my best Half in several years. Better than that is the gold medal. It's pretty darn cool.

Great to see several friends at the finish, including Debra Horn, Debbie Makowski, and Chadwick Sunday, who generously took some photos and sent them to me. On the whole, the Pan American Masters Games was a blast, and I'm happy I did it.







Tuesday, July 16, 2024

Pan American Masters Games 5000

Today's Pan American Masters Games 5000-meter race was similar in several ways to Sunday's 1500-meter run. But first, the differences:

-This race consisted of several age groups cobbled together. The 20+ of us ranged in age from 60 to 89. We would still score within our age groups.

-At 12 1/2 laps, 5000 meters is a lot longer than 1500. I didn't think the distance would be a big deal, but in that mid-day heat, it was.

-I went into the race slightly more confident and self-assured. I shouldn't have.

-On Sunday, I ran faster as the race progressed. Today, it was quite the opposite.

Now for the similarities:

-Did I mention that it was hot? Even though the temperature was similar (upper 80s), the heat took its toll on me more today.

-Like Sunday, I wasn't overly concerned about my time. Again, I ran slower than I thought I could, but, as they say, it's a race, not a time trial.

-Once again, I was impressed with the fast runners. And even the slow ones (who were mere mortals like myself). Overall, I was in the middle of the pack today.

-Like Sunday, I finished well behind Bill Long, who wound up second. I was third, so I received another PAMG Bronze Medal. My time was 26:03, over a minute slower than my last road 5K. Did I mention that it's a race, not a time trial? Oh, I guess I did.

Next comes the PAMG Half-Marathon scheduled for Sunday.

Sunday, July 14, 2024

Pan American Masters Games 1500

First-place guy took the lead right away and never looked back. He was what they call gone. Second-place guy was also well ahead of us slow-pokes. "Us slow-pokes" consisted of third-place guy and fourth-place guy, me.

This was the Pan American Masters Games 1500 race for males 70-74 at Baldwin Wallace Finnie Stadium. I'd gone in with much fear and trepidation. A metric-mile track race was far outside my comfort zone. I felt like a fish out of water. I thought it possible, perhaps probable, that I might finish dead last or get lapped, or both. 

But on this humid, ninety-degree day, I was managing to hold my own. I was close to third-place guy, but I couldn't seem to pass him. Until the final 100 meters, that is. That's when I found another gear, one I never knew I had. I never thought of myself as a kicker, but kick I did today. I finished third in 6:59, a second or two in front of the other guy. I wound up with a nice PAMG bronze medal.

It was great meeting my competitors and seeing all sorts of new and old friends. My fear was, it turns out, unfounded. Coming up next: the track 5000 on Tuesday, and the Half Marathon next Sunday. 








Friday, July 12, 2024

Done, Done, or, Longing for Lester

We now have to park for our Lester Rail Trail runs at the corner of Fenn and Route 57. It seems that certain members of our clan were busted for parking at the York Township Municipality Lot too early in the morning. So I announced that today's run would begin and end at the new location with loops at 5, 6, and 7 AM. Those times are kind of typical for me and for me and for everyone else. 

The final 6 miles are often, although not always, pretty lonely for me. Most of my friends, it seems, work for a living and these runs are often on weekdays (today's run was on a Friday). They usually need to be done and on their way home by 7 or earlier. That loneliness often, but not always, translates to a poor finish to my long run.

Today was slightly different. Although I'd planned to be there for each start time, and although I did want to get 18 miles in, I decided to begin super-duper early (4:15) with Michelle and Andy Wolff, and thus have only about 2 miles left when everyone else finished at 7:00 AM. Surely, 2 miles alone wouldn't be so bad.

Things didn't go quite as planned. Other friends (Shannon Barnes, Chadwick and Ella Sunday, and Julie Boggs) showed up at 5 as planned. As we began talking, I learned that Julie had been planning on doing all three loops - the ones I had promised to be there for. Now, I couldn't let Julie run those last miles alone, so even though I had nearly 4 in to begin with, I agreed to accompany her for the 7 AM loop in its entirety. This would put me at close to 22 miles, which is 10-20 percent longer than my usual long runs. But if I say there will be a 7AM loop, dad-burn it if there won't.

Those final miles were indeed slower for me, but the good news is that they got done. Or, as I used to say as a Project Manager, they were 'done, done.'

Thursday, July 11, 2024

Local Traffic Only


Been a tough summer. The heat isn't as bad here as for other parts of the planet, but it's still hot enough for me, thank you. And of course, it's not just the heat, it's the humility.

It wasn't wonderful last week when we turned the water on, and the water didn't come on. That's about the same time that we noticed the preponderance of traffic cutting through our subdivision. The problem? One of Brunswick's several annual water main breaks had occurred right by our subdivision. The water service was restored later that same day, thank goodness, but the road has remained closed through today. It does look like they may be able to re-open it soon.

What a unique opportunity, I thought. I can run on the usually busy 303 with only local traffic to bother with. But that's not the way things turned out. Not only is there a lot of local traffic, I think much of the traffic isn't truly local; they're just cutting through. So not only is there still some traffic on 303 itself, cars are going every which way through the subdivision and everywhere else.

None of this would bother me so much if I was running better. But I'm not, so it does.


Wednesday, July 10, 2024

The Shadow Knows

From the Wright Opera House: 'One of the most popular radio shows in history, The Shadow went on the air in August of 1930 and ran until 1954. "Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? The Shadow knows!" The opening lines of the "Detective Story" program captivated listeners and are instantly recognizable even today.' My own shadow knows for sure how slow I am. It also knows that I will never, even in my wildest dreams, be able to outrun it. And finally, it does indeed know that evil lurks in my heart.

Dan and his Shadow

Today's run at Lake Medina was a case in point. All my friends were there. Until they weren't. Then, it was three more extremely sluggish miles by myself. There are times (few and far between) when I can continue running well, even after everyone else leaves the scene. Today was not one of those days. It was warm and tropically humid, and this doesn't even take into account the humility.

Yet, there was a pretty sunrise, and that got me thinking about my old shadow. I believe that it's almost as old as I am. And it's run just about the same amount of miles.

But sometimes, I just wish it would shut the f up.


Here are a couple more pics of Lake Medina from today's saunter. 




Thursday, July 04, 2024

Sizzling through the Ages

Best I can tell, I've done the Medina Twin Sizzler 5K 13 times, and the 10K 9 times. I may have missed some. The Fourth of July is a big day for road races, and I've done a bunch of others as well over the years. But after today's race, I decided to create a list of my Sizzler Times. Here you go:


Notice any trends? Me neither.

Today's races were as enjoyable as any. I love seeing the Medina Square buzzing like it does on the Fourth. And I love seeing all my friends out there, sweating along with me. It's all tons of fun.




Tuesday, July 02, 2024

How Long Should Your Long Run Be, and Other Questions

This article first appeared in the March/April 2005 edition of Marathon & Beyond.


How Long Should Your Long Run Be, and Other Questions

It’s Your Important Training Element – Are You Doing it Right?

by Dan Horvath


It’s been called the cornerstone of marathon training. It’s been called the Marathoner’s “Bread and Butter”. Most succinctly, it’s been called the Most Important Marathon and Ultra Training Element. ‘It’, as you may have guessed, is the long run. Nearly everyone agrees that long runs need to be done. The only question is how.


‘How’, of course, is actually more than one question. How long? How fast? How many? And those are just for starters. Should the pace be steady? Should long runs be weekly? What is the best surface? The list goes on. Of course what you want to know most of all is, what will work best for me?



Why Run Long?


You won’t find too many marathoners or ultra-marathoners that don’t do long runs. Coaches, running authors and other experts recommend them for all runners, but particularly for those training for 26.2 miles or more. Most of us accept the efficacy of long runs almost without question. But let’s ask it anyway: why should we run long?


The most important reason is this: training is specific. It’s just like your mother told you: if you want to be good at something, practice, practice, practice. You are not going to become a world-class sprinter by jogging 70 miles per week, on roads, at a conversational pace. And you’re not going to reach your potential in the marathon by not running those long distances in training.


The human body’s ability to adapt is truly amazing. Long runs “teach” your body to store and use glycogen appropriately, process and eliminate lactate efficiently, and operate efficiently even while slightly dehydrated. Important bodily operations, such as bladder and bowel functions, learn to adapt as well. Perhaps the most important thing your body learns is how to stay on its feet and continually move forward for an extended period of time, staving off muscle fatigue as much as possible. Remaining vertical happens to be a critical success factor for marathons and ultras.


Long runs also train your brain. Your mind becomes accustomed to the rhythm of your stride over a matter of hours, as opposed to minutes. You gain confidence in your ability to perform in the race itself.


There is yet another reason to run long, although not all runners would necessarily agree. But they should. Long runs are fun! Whether it’s alone, in pairs, or as part of some larger group, a long run can actually be a joyful experience. Running for three hours can have an almost dream-like quality. Just think: you’re away from work, your computer, the tube, games, music (usually), and most of all, the demands of other people, for two or more hours. Assuming you’ve found a reasonably quiet, safe place for your running, you may also be able to avoid traffic, noise and pollution as well. Opportunities for such solitude outside of running are quite rare these days. And the icing on the cake is that you’re doing something you enjoy, and derive benefit from, the whole time!



How Far?


Just what is a long run? And, more specifically, how long should your long run be?


To answer the first question, we have to be a bit arbitrary. We could say that a person’s longest run of a given week is a long run. But while 10, 12 or 15 miles may be the longest weekly run for many who are in the early stages of their training, nearly all marathoners and ultra-marathoners ought to include runs longer than that during their latter training stages. With this in mind, let’s pick 18 miles as the minimum distance for a long run. It’s greater than the distances noted above, and most runners will perform their best if their training includes runs of 18 miles or more.


To satisfy the needs of slower runners, and those who run strictly by time, let’s add a time measurement to the definition. To run 18 miles at a 9 minute per mile pace would take 2 hours, 42 minutes. So arbitrarily once again, we can suggest that long runs are either 18 miles or more, or 2 hours, 40 minutes or more, whichever measurement is less. Thus runners doing 9 minutes per mile or slower can say that they’ve done a long run after 160 minutes on the road, while faster runners might call anything 18 miles or more a long run, even if they’ve covered the distance in 2 hours and 15 minutes.


The question as to how long your long run should be is the more important one. It’s best answered by asking other, more pointed, questions.


What are you training for?

An ultra runner who has a 100 miler coming up will want to put some very long runs out there. Six to eight hour trail runs are not unusual. Most marathon runners should complete their long runs in less than four hours.


Where are you in your schedule?

Most runners schedule a peak in mileage, speed, and long run mileage about 4 to 5 weeks before their event. For middle of the pack marathoners, you may want to work up to a long run of 18 miles early on, and then increase it to 22 or so with about 4 weeks to go.


How much can you handle?

Some runners, even some very good marathoners, simply cannot run too many miles without breaking down. In addition, you need to save something for your mid-week running. Everyone handles the recovery from long runs differently. It would be safe to say that you should run as long as you can, while recovering enough to be able to run strong again in another 48 hours.


Have you been hitting the wall?

If your longest long runs have been in the 18 to 20 mile range and you’ve been hitting the wall around the 20-mile mark during your marathons, this may be telling you something. Consider increasing the length of your long runs to 23 or so, within the context of some of the other questions explored in this section.


How many weekly miles are you doing? If your mileage is in the 35 miles per week range and you plan to do a 25-mile training run without increasing overall mileage, that leaves only 10 other miles for your mid-week training. So 25 may be a bit much. On the other hand, if you’re doing 140 miles a week, and your two-a-day schedule never lets you run more than 15 miles at one time, your long runs may possibly be too short. For less extreme cases, let’s devise another arbitrary rule of thumb. Let’s say that for most runners, your long run should be between 25 and 35 percent of your weekly mileage. An 80 mile-per-week runner running a 20 miler is in the 25% range, while a 55 mile a week runner doing that same long run is near the 35% range. The 35 and the 140 mile per week runners will, be outside this range, so some modifications may be necessary.


How long should you be on your feet?

One rule of thumb has been to run as long, time-wise, as you expect to for your marathon. If you’re planning on a 3:16 (7:30 pace) marathon, your longest long run would be 3:16 at perhaps an 8:30 pace (about 23 miles). Slower marathoners and ultra runners would need to put some kind of reasonable maximum on the amount of vertical time – perhaps 3 hours, 40 minutes for the marathoners.


Which experts do you believe?

Jeff Galloway has long been an advocate for slow training runs of 26 miles and longer. Pete Pfitzinger believes that most long runs should be in the 20 to 22 mile range, with one or two only slightly longer. Joe Henderson agrees with the “run as many minutes as you expect to in the marathon, but slower” philosophy. Jack Daniels believes that upper limits for long runs ought to be 20 to 22 miles for faster runners, and 20 miles for slower runners.


Once you’re well into your training schedule and able to handle long runs in excess of 21 miles, consider alternating long runs with extra long runs. Your long runs may be 20 miles and your extra-long runs may be 23 to 25 miles each. This way you achieve the confidence and strength required for a marathon, but not quite every week, so you’ll still have something left for that mid-week training.



How Fast?


This question is naturally intertwined with that of how far. If you run very far (say, 30 miles or more), you probably can’t run as fast as when you’re keeping your long runs on the short side (say around 18 miles). Conversely, if you run extremely slow, you may not be able cover the distance you need to in a reasonable period of time. It may be fine for ultra-marathoners to spend 6 Sunday-morning hours on the trails, but this may be counter-productive to a fast marathon time.


Galloway, Henderson and several others believe long runs should be at a very slow pace. Many suggest 1 ½ to 2 minutes per mile slower than your race pace. Galloway has espoused the practice of taking walking breaks during long runs as well as during the marathon itself. ‘Gallo-walking’ has proven to be somewhat successful for those without aggressive time goals.


Jack Daniels recommends that long runs should be at an easy pace. Based on recent race performances, average runners’, ‘easy’ pace works out to about a minute per mile slower than marathon race pace. Faster runners should run slightly faster than that, and slower runners a bit slower. Other middle-of-the-road advice comes from Pete Pfitzinger. He recommends that your long run pace be 10 to 20 percent slower than planned marathon pace.


And then there’s Marathon and Beyond’s own Rich Benyo. Remember the part about practice, practice, practice? How can you expect to run all 26.2 miles of a marathon at a 7:30 pace, when all of your long run mileage has been at a 9:30 pace? In this instance, you’ve taught your body to run long distances, but at a much slower pace than you want to go during the race. Benyo believes that long runs should be at marathon pace or slightly faster, and he has incorporated this concept into his training plans. Of course this isn’t easy. And of course there’s a bit of controversy about this. But this approach sure puts the specificity of training concept to the test.


The best approach, of course, is what works best for you. You may need to experiment with all three concepts listed above to determine which is optimal. Consider varying the pace during the run itself. Perhaps you might try breaking the run up into three or four parts and run each at a slightly faster pace until you’re doing the last 5 miles at marathon pace.


Also consider alternating fast and slow long runs. You can incorporate this idea with that of alternating the distance of your long runs. For example, a 3:15 marathoner might run a 20-miler one week at 7:45 pace, and then a 24-miler the next week at 8:30 pace. To take the example a step further, this runner might consider running the last 5 miles of the last 24-miler at her or his marathon pace of 7:30 per mile.



How Often?


For better or worse, most of us adhere to a weekly work and social schedule. For practical reasons, it’s natural to align a training schedule with that social and work schedule. Thus we have weekly speedwork sessions, weekly days of rest and weekly long runs. It doesn’t absolutely have to be this way; some coaches who believe that a long run every 7 days is too often, recommend a ten-day training cycle, with one long run per cycle. But this may not be realistic for those of us who also do non-running work for a living. Some, including Galloway, have suggested that a long run every two weeks is optimal.

Most coaches, however, stay with the weekly schedule. It may make sense to skip a weekly long run on occasion, perhaps substituting a race or speedwork session. So consider skipping the long run in favor of rest, speedwork or a race during one weekend each month.



How Many?


Some runners do weekly long runs all year, even during the off-season. For these individuals, this question becomes mute. The more important questions are, how long is your training period, and what kind of shape are you in at the start of it.


Most training plans are 12 to 18 weeks long, although some are as long as 24 weeks. Let’s say that 16 weeks is typical. Assuming the long runs are to be done weekly, the next question is, when do they start? In other words, at what point in the 16-week schedule will your longest run reach 18 miles? Let’s say that most runners would be scheduled to reach this point by the halfway point. In this case, the runner would do about 7 long runs (weeks 8 through 14), with weeks 15 and 16 reserved for a taper and the race itself. The length of these long runs will vary as noted above. This number could be reduced by one or two for runners who decide to skip a long run or substitute a race.


Some will think that 7 long runs are too many, and others (those all-year weekly long-run types) will think they’re too few. It’s going to vary by individual, but it’s worthy to note that there should be some minimum number of long runs in order to expect a decent marathon performance. Let’s arbitrarily say that the minimum number of long runs that should be done in preparation for a marathon or ultra is four.



How Hilly and How Rough?


Since this is actually several terrain-related questions, let’s examine each one:


Is it better to run on trails, if your goal event is on roads?

Many runners enjoy doing much of their training, and particularly their long runs, on trails. They feel that the surface is easier on the joints, and yet still affords a great and enjoyable workout. Most of the rest of us would derive some benefit by adding trail runs to our regimen. If your goal event is on paved roads, however, remember that training is specific. You won’t perform your best unless you include at least some runs, including long ones, on that same surface. The two main reasons are that you can train faster on roads than on trails, and secondly that your body will get used to the stress of the harder surface.


Is it better to train on asphalt versus concrete?

This one’s easy: asphalt by a mile; by a light-year. Concrete is much too hard a surface, and should be avoided as much as possible for your long runs. What if your goal marathon is on a concrete surface? The best advice would be to pick another marathon. If you still want to do that one, training on asphalt should be as adequate as anything. It would be much better to train on asphalt than concrete for a concrete event because you’ll have had enough hard surface training, yet you will not have had the impact problems that you would have had you run on concrete.


Should you do long runs on a treadmill?

Not unless you have a good movie to watch. Long runs on treadmills are fine, mostly because you’re never far from your starting point, the risk of injury is slightly lower and recovery is faster. You won’t find too many marathons where there is a gentle moving belt under your feet however. As with the trails, you should do at least some of your long runs on the type of surface that your goal event will have.


Should you train on hills if your goal event will be flat? Should you train on hills if your goal event will be hilly?

The short answers are, yes - to some degree, and YES! Hill training will benefit all runners, even those training for a flat event. Hill training is an integral component in many running plans, including those devised by Arthur Lydyard. Incorporating hills into long runs make them interesting, challenging and fun. This should be done in moderation for those training for flat events however. In these cases, it’s especially important to keep the hills moderate for the last few long runs leading up to the event. If, on the other hand, you’re training for an event that you know will be hilly, then you should try to incorporate those hills into your long runs as much as possible. It would even be helpful to include substantial downhill running for downhill races such as Boston.



Putting it All Together


All runners should understand that by making their long runs too long or too fast, they assume the risk of jeopardizing their mid-week training. On the other hand, the more specific a runner’s training is, the better chance he or she will have of achieving his or her goals. It’s an important balance, to make your weekend long runs challenging enough, and yet be able to run hard again by the following Tuesday or so.


Long runs are not to be taken lightly. You are going to be out in the elements and exerting your body for a matter of 2 hours or more. This isn’t easy. Do a mini-taper, and allow time for recovery afterwards. Carbo-load to some extent. Get proper rest before and after. How much you prepare will have a direct impact on the quality of your long runs. And the quality of your long runs will have a direct impact on the quality of your race.


Running long runs with others helps take the drudgery out of them, making them more of a social experience. Gordon Bakoulis Bloch believes that this makes them easier mentally. And for this very reason, Bloch recommends that at least one or two be done solo. This is still another aspect of the need to train your mind.


You can consider substituting a race for one of your long runs, but take care. A half-marathon, 25K, 30K or even a full marathon can be an excellent training device. But remember to keep your eyes on the prize – your own goal race. Run these ‘training races’ at perhaps 90% of effort, so that a speedy recovery is ensured. This is especially so if you’re within 5 to 6 weeks of your goal race.


Oh, yeah. And remember to have fun!



 SIDEBAR – A Long Run Schedule


Most marathoners and ultra-marathoners plan on a 12 to 24 week training schedule, with 16 weeks being most typical. With that in mind, here are long run schedules for runners who average 45, 65 and 85 miles per week. “Easy” speed means about 1 to ½ minutes per mile slower than planned marathon pace. “Brisk” means about ½ to ¾ minutes per mile slower than marathon pace. For those weeks that call for marathon pace running, make sure that you gradually work up to that speed. And if you choose to include other races, take care not to run them too hard.


Week

Long Run Distance- on 45 Miles per week

Long Run Distance- on 65 Miles per week

Long Run Distance- on 85 Miles per week

Speed

1

13

15

15

Easy

2

16

17

18

Easy

3

14

16

18

Easy

4

17

18

19

Easy

5

15

18

18

Gradually increase speed - last few miles at marathon pace

6

17

20

21

Easy

7

16

18

20

Brisk pace

8

19

22

23

Easy

9

18

20

20

Consider substituting a long race

10

19

22

24

Easy

11

18

20

21

Brisk pace

12

20

23

25

Easy

13

18

20

21

Consider substituting a long race. But don’t kill yourself

14

21

24

25

2nd half at marathon pace

15

18

20

22

Easy, but finish at marathon pace

16

10

12

13

Easy

17

GOAL RACE

GOAL RACE

GOAL RACE

Optimal!


 SIDEBAR – What do the elites do?


The elite runners are different from the rest of us. They run faster. What the elites do isn’t always what we should do. But it sure doesn’t hurt to study them. We might even learn something. Unfortunately, not all elites share their training schedules. For those that do, we don’t always have the complete story. Here are a few pieces of information, from both current and ‘old-guard’ runners.


Khalid Khannouchi does about 8 long runs of up to 22 miles during his 16 week build-up. He runs them hard and finishes extremely hard – often doing the last few miles faster than marathon pace.


2000 Olympic Marathon champion Naoko Takahashi reputedly ran up to 80 kilometers some of her training days, but there are more credible reports of runs of 40K at 10,000 feet of altitude. Either way, that’s some running!


Greg Meyer ran 20-mile fartlek training runs on the Boston Marathon course during the weeks leading up to the event.


During his best racing years, Bill Rodgers ran a ‘good quality’ 20 to 23 miler every weekend.


Multiple Comrades Marathon champion Bruce Fordyce believed in doing relatively few long runs as part of his long ultramarathon training schedule. He usually did one 35 to 43 miler, eight 26 to 35 milers and three 20 to 26 milers. Fordyce did do other slightly shorter runs that many would consider ‘long’.


Rob de Castella’s training schedule called for weekly runs in the 20 to 22 mile range. He ran these in times anywhere from 2:15 to 2:40.


For Grete Waitz, training for the marathon was different from training for shorter races only in that the overall mileage was higher, and this was mostly in the form of her long runs. Her long runs were in the 15 to 18 mile range leading up to her marathons.


1972 Marathon champion Frank Shorter ran his long runs in the 20-mile range. He says that he ran the first half of these relatively slowly – at about 6:27 per mile pace, but then did the second half at about 5:00 per mile pace.



 Bibliography


Benyo, R. 1992. Making the Marathon Your Event. Random House of Canada Ltd., Toronto, ON

Benyo, R. 2002. Basic Training for a 3:30 Marathon, Marathon and Beyond, Vol 6, Number 2.

Benyo, R. 2002. Basic Training for a 3:00 Marathon, Marathon and Beyond, Vol 6, Number 3.

Benyo, R. and Henderson, J. 2002. Running Encyclopedia. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL

Bloch, G. B. 1993. How to Train for and Run Your Best Marathon. Fireside, New York, NY

Daniels, J. 1998. Daniels’ Running Formula. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL

Galloway, J. 1984. Galloway’s Book of Running. Shelter Publications, Bolinas, CA

Higdon, H. 1997. How to Train. Rodale Press, Inc., Emmaus, PA

Khannouchi, K. 2003. Run Your Best Marathon Runners World, Aug. 2003 pp 80-81

Noakes, T. 2003. Lore of Running. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL

Pfitzinger, P. and Douglass, S. 2001. Advanced Marathoning. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL

Pfitzinger, P. 2003. The Pfitzinger Lab Report: Your Long Run Prescription Running Times Sept. and Oct. 2003. pp 12.


The Quiet Explosion in 24-Hour Running

This article appeared in the July/August 2013 edition of Marathon & Beyond. Enjoy.


The Quiet Explosion in 24-Hour Running
When the term “one day” takes on an entirely different meaning.
By Dan Horvath

For most races, the goal is to determine who go run the fastest. This goes for all distances, including marathons and ultramarathons. For those of us in the middle of the pack, it may be more a question of How fast can I run? rather than Can I run faster than everyone else? Regardless of one’s prospects, the elementary nature of the event is still a race to see how fast everyone can get to the finish. In 24-hour and other fixed-time runs, the question changes entirely. The query becomes How far can I run?
    
Happily, running events of nearly all distances are experiencing a great deal of growth, in both the quantity of events and the number of participants. That growth applies to ultramarathons as well. UltraRunning Magazine reports that the number of runners who finished ultramarathon races increased to 52,000 in 2011. This represents an increase of 12 percent more than 2010, and triple the number of finishers of 2001. There are, unfortunately, no known statistics regarding the number of these finishers that participated in a fixed-time ultramarathon.

We can postulate with reasonable certainty, however, that the number of fixed-time ultramarathon races is growing at least as fast as other trail and road ultras. Although no one seems to be collecting overall statistics for these events, some informal information gathering tells us that well over thirty 24-hour runs are now held annually in the US, whereas only a handful existed as recently as just a few years ago. (See the sidebar: A Sampling of 24-Hour Running Events.) The rapid growth, at least in the number of these events, mirrors the growth of the sport of ultrarunning itself.

The word race usually means a contest to determine who can cover a given distance the fastest, and is used rather loosely here. Other than calling the fixed-time races runs or events, there’s simply no other word for them than races. Although we mention other timed events here, this article focuses mostly on the 24-hour variety.

Besides their growth in popularity, these races are also seeing more and more outstanding performances. In 2012, for example, runners broke both the US men’s and women’s 24-hour records. Mike Morton set the men’s record of 172.458 miles, smashing the old record of 165 miles set by Scott Jurek. And Connie Gardner set the US women’s 24-hour record with 149.368 miles, after very narrowly missing the mark several times in past years. Both records were set at the IAU 24-Hour World Championship in Katowice, Poland.

Unfortunately, all of this—the growth and the great running—appears to be happening “under the radar.” Little attention is given to it by running resources. One can say that ultrarunning in general gets little attention, but even so, timed racing gets even less. This dichotomy of high popularity without much attention explains the title of this article.

Mike Morton

Connie Gardner and others




    How Do These Things Work?
    
Fixed-time races come in a variety of shapes and sizes, but they have elements in common. Here are some of the components.

Although 24-hour runs are by far the most prevalent, 6-hour, 12-hour, 48-hour, 72-hour, and even 6- and 10-day timed events are also popular. The combination of a 24-hour run with one or more additional fixed-time events is common. Still, the 24-hour runs are often the marquee events.

The course may be on any surface. Most ultramarathons in the US are run on trails. A quick look at the sidebar list of 24-hour events shows that several of these, too, are on soft surfaces. But many are run on paved roads and all-purpose trails. Some are on 400-meter synthetic or rubberized tracks. The advantage of dirt trails is that the softer surface translates to less impact over the course of a full day of running. The advantage of a paved surface is the potential for improved performance; most runners will be able to cover more miles on a road or all-purpose trail than a dirt trail. Tracks may provide both a softer landing and possible top performances. For tracks, however, the constant turning, the shorter length (which increases traffic and allows for fewer competitors), and decreased scenery add their own challenges.

Many courses are flat. The ones with significant hills are usually the trail variety. Hills inevitably result in less ground covered. Most records are achieved on flat courses. That said, some runners might find that some slight amount of altitude variation on a course provides a benefit of more varied muscle use. 

Runners of fixed-time events usually prefer that the courses contain as few sharp turns as possible. In fact, the fewer and wider the turns, the better. Courses with many of them, such as 400-meter tracks (meaning two large turns per loop, about eight per mile), often call for a reversal of direction at regular intervals in order to reduce the amount of stress runners experience due to the constant turning.

None of this is to say that any particular surface, hilliness, or number of turns is in any way superior to others. Just as fixed-distance roads and trails feature different challenges that affect top or record performances, so do fixed-time courses.

The USA Track and Field Mountain Ultra Trail Council designates one event as the men’s and women’s 24-hour national championship run each year. The top runners from the championship as well as other races are picked to represent the US at the International Ultramarathon Association World Championship. Both the national championship and the world championship are usually held at a venue with a paved surface. The participants want to get as far as humanly possible.

Timed ultramarathons are held on loop courses so the distances can be measured. Runners are scored by their total overall distance achieved within the given time limit. This means they must complete the loop as many times as possible. The distance might be anything from 400 meters to several miles.. Most runners feel that they can achieve their greatest distance on an asphalt (not concrete) paved trail that is at least a half-mile in length, and has no sharp turns or hills. Loops of one mile or thereabouts are the most common. Many races take place within a park or other closed area where traffic control is not a concern.

Timing is a critical component. Of course it is necessary to count the number of circuits for every runner in order to determine their distance. This can be done manually in one of several ways, but in order to track a large number of runners accurately, including their lap split times, required for USATF records, electronic chip timing is practically a necessity. The rapid growth of timed races could not have taken place without the emergence of electronic timing in the past fifteen years.

Race rules vary, but in general, runners may have their own support crews in addition to any aid provided by the race organization. Runners may stop running for aid or even to rest, but the clock, as they say, keeps on ticking.

End-of-race procedures vary as much as the other, more general race rules. In some cases participants drop a marker when the final horn blows, so that they can be given credit for any partial lap. In other cases, an hour or so before the finish time, runners are moved onto a smaller loop area, such as a 400-meter track, and are given credit for the number of full smaller laps, in addition to their previous mileage. In a third scenario, only the full laps are counted regardless of the loop length.

    The State of the Sport 
    
It may surprise you to learn that there is an active and rapidly growing subculture of fixed-time ultrarunning specialists. Arguably, a runner who is capable of running long distances ought to be able to do so over different terrain, whether by running loops or traversing a non-repeating course. And this is indeed the case with many runners, including some of the best. But others, including some of those on the US National Team, appear to do well mainly at the fixed-time variety of ultramarathon. Still others, who may have excelled at trail ultras, have had disappointing results at 24-hour and longer fixed-time runs.

The top performances just keep right on coming. The records set at the 2012 24-Hour World Championships are only the most recent examples. As noted, Connie Gardner had narrowly missed the US women’s record—by less than four miles in 2010 and 2012, and by less than one mile in 2007 and 2011. She was the second overall female at the world championships. Sabrina Moran had set the US mark only a few months earlier in Cleveland. Also at the world championship, US runners Suzanna Bon and Anne Lundblad also turned in great performances, and the US women won the team title.

Scott Jurek had set the previous men’s record at the 2010 24-Hour World Championships, eclipsing Mark Godale’s ten-year-old record. When Mike Morton won the 2012 world championship meet overall, he broke Jurek’s record by an astounding seven miles. The US men, including Morton, Harvey Lewis, and Joe Fejes, scored third in the world behind Germany and France.

At other events, Fejes also ran a monumental distance—over 329 miles—at the 2012 Across the Years 72-hour run. Another US National team member, Phil McCarthy, set the American record for 48 hours of 256.771 miles in the 2011 Three Days at the Fair run.

So yes, American runners are among the best in the world, and they keep getting better. One reason for this is that American fixed-time events are also among the best in the world. Most are well organized, and manifest outstanding attention to detail. Some of the most prominent of them are:
    • 24 The Hard Way: Runners have a choice or running 24, 12, or 6 hours on a dirt trail or a paved path. The event takes place in Oklahoma in October. The 24-hour race will serve as the USATF National Championship in 2013.
    • Across the Years: This Arizona race features 24-, 48-, and 72-hour runs. Depending on their choice of event, runners may be running from New Year’s Eve into New Year’s Day. Operational since 1983 (with a hiatus in 2009), this is one of the longest-running fixed-time events in the country. ATY has a proud tradition and a loyal following.
    • NorthCoast 24-Hour Endurance Run: There are spring and fall versions of this run at Edgewater Park on the shore of Lake Erie in Cleveland, Ohio. It was the National championship from 2009 through 2012, and it will be again in 2014. There have been some great performances over the years, including those of Connie Gardner and Sabrina Moran.
    • The Sri Chimnoy Self-Transcendence 6-Day, 10-Day and 3100-Mile Races: It sounds like a lot and it is. Although the 3100-mile race is not strictly speaking a fixed-time race, it features many similarities to fixed-time races. The Sri Chimnoy family of events, too, have a long and proud tradition and history.
    • Three Days at the Fair: Runs of 72, 48, 24, 12, and 6 hours are featured at the Sussex County Fairgrounds in New Jersey. All events except the 6-hour race finish at 9:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning in May. Runners can also enter marathon and 50K distance races. The US men’s 48-hour record was set here in 2011.

So you think you may want to run one? Not so fast!

The first question is why. For most of us, the answer is something like to see how far I can go. As with any quest, the more specific you can be, the better. You stand a better chance of accomplishing something meaningful if you say to yourself, I want to run 100K, rather than simply, I want to run until I crash. Goals are good because they keep us focused. And focus is definitely something you will want to hone if you’re thinking of tackling a fixed-time race. On the other hand, it’s also important not to set your expectations too high, especially if you’re a first-timer. Many an experienced ultrarunner has underestimated the difficulty of running for 24 hours. For example, an elite ultrarunner may complete a 100-mile trail race in 14 hours, but after 14 hours of a 24-hour run, there are still 10 hours to go. Our hypothetical runner, perhaps used to running for only so long, might simply crash shortly after the completion of those first 100 miles. Despite the fact that, depending on the terrain and surface, one can generally travel for more miles in a timed event than a fixed-distance race, it’s easy to become overconfident. Yet some of the records—such as the ones noted above—are simply phenomenal. They reflect an extraordinary amount of focus and determination.

Fixed-time races are also an excellent opportunity to run a first ultramarathon. While focus and determination are still required, new ultramarathoners may be surprised at what they can accomplish, given enough time.

Fixed-time running certainly isn’t for everyone. Many ultrarunners strongly prefer to run on trails through remote and scenic areas. Loop courses are, in the eyes of some ultrarunners, decidedly more boring and tedious. However, if a runner can master the sometimes mind-numbing effort, he or she may be able to achieve a distance not possible under other circumstances.

Believe it or not, timed events can also be loads of fun. For some, the joy comes from seeing and running alongside all the other competitors during the entire time of the run. Having a crew, perhaps at a campsite with a tent, also adds to the enjoyment. On the other hand, some runners prefer the challenge of supporting themselves without the benefit of a crew. Think of these events as parties where people run, as opposed to races … where people party.

The competitive aspect can be intensely interesting as well. Each runner is often within sight of others who may be rivals. There have been exciting instances where one runner has overtaken another for place, or two top runners have run together nearing the final lap of a 24-hour run.

Nevertheless, there’s still that simple challenge of seeing how far one can go. For many runners, being able to run 100 miles within 24 hours is a great and worthy goal. Mathematically, it doesn’t sound so tough: just average 14:24 per mile. Many people can do this simply by walking fast. And the best chance to accomplish such a mission is most likely a well-organized 24-hour run. But beware—sticking to it gets harder as time goes on. No matter how slow and easy the early pace may seem, things always get tougher late into the night.

Should you go in with a detailed plan, or just run all out until you crash and burn? Framing the question this way makes the answer fairly obvious, but it may surprise you to learn that many runners—even some very good ones—go into fixed-time races without any strategy whatsoever. This is not to deny that some of them have accomplished much by starting out hard and staying with it. But for most of us, a strategy will provide us the best chance of reaching our goal. Many runners employ a race plan that includes walking breaks at regular intervals. And as with runs of any length, pacing oneself, especially in the early part, is of vital importance.

Your chance of success will naturally depend mostly on your preparation. Those who include long distance running, ideally over several years, in their training will have an advantage, but so will those who practice running at various times of the day and night hours, as well as those who practice their pace along with planned walking breaks.

All this serves to answer one just little question. You know the one: How far can you run?


    Sidebar—Resources
    
    • American Ultrarunning Association (AUA): http://www.americanultra.org/
    • International Association of Ultrarunners (IUA): http://www.iau-ultramarathon.org/
    • Multidays website: http://multidays.com
    • UltraRunning magazine website: http://ultrarunning.com/index.shtml
    • iRunFar website: http://www.irunfar.com
    • USATF Mountain Ultra Trail site: http://usatf.org/Sports/MUT.aspx
    • Washington Post article about ultramarathon growth: 
        http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-05-23/sports/35458185_1_trail-races-runners-hope-marathons


    Sidebar—Some Timed Races




The Hinckley Nine (Times Two)

It had been a while since I'd run the old nine-mile Heavenly Hinckley Hills course. It had been a long while since I'd done it twice. There had been some talk about a 7:30 loop to follow our standard 6:00 AM one, but those talks fell through. Not wanting to run so late alone for a second loop, I show up early to get it done and out of the way before the 6AM'ers even appear. Early means 4:15 AM or so.

Naturally, that first mile up Bellus Road hill is pretty darn slow. But I somehow find a slow but steady pace after that, and I somehow manage to complete the circuit before anyone else arrives. It's mighty warm and humid, just as it's been since the early morning gloom. Will I be able to stay with these fast folk for miles 10-18?

Surprisingly, I can and I do. My second loop gets done much faster than my first. Not bad. But now I gotta keep doing these doubles.